Biconomy vs Impossible Cloud Network — how do they compare? Biconomy trades at Rp243.66 (market cap Rp242,71M, Rp73,57M 24h volume), while Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,856 (market cap Rp722,23M, Rp46,41M 24h volume). The key difference: Impossible Cloud Network is far larger — about 3× Biconomy's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's supply is capped (253M / 700M ICNT (37%)) while Biconomy's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Biconomy for 35 Days and Impossible Cloud Network for 3 Days on average.
| BICO | ICNT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp242,71M | Rp722,23M |
Volume (24h) | Rp73,57M | Rp46,41M |
Circulating Supply | 1B BICO | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) |
Typical Hold Time | 35 Days | 3 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Biconomy is a multichain relayer protocol that aims to improve the user onboarding and transaction experience on decentralized applications (dApps). In short, Biconomy focuses on transaction management and gas optimization and can reduce gas costs by up to 40%.
Read more on BICO →Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →