Berachain vs GameSwift — how do they compare? Berachain trades at Rp3,400 (market cap Rp1,01T, Rp205,18M 24h volume), while GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume). The key difference: Berachain is far larger — about 80095.2× GameSwift's market cap, and GameSwift's supply is capped (360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%)) while Berachain's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Berachain for 15 Days and GameSwift for 9 Days on average.
| BERA | GSWIFT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,01T | Rp12,61M |
Volume (24h) | Rp205,18M | Rp958,63jt |
Circulating Supply | 298,6M BERA | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 15 Days | 9 Days |
Berachain's PoL mechanism changes L1 economics by creating a marketplace for validators, users, and apps. Validators stake BERA to secure the network and earn BGT rewards, which they can use for application rewards. This system helps scale chain rewards based on demand for security and liquidity.
Read more on BERA →GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →