Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Polyhedra Network (ZKJ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Polyhedra Network — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.57 (market cap Rp1,28T, Rp47,59M 24h volume), while Polyhedra Network trades at Rp100.5 (market cap Rp79,75M, Rp38,8M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 16050.2× Polyhedra Network's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 800,9M / 1B ZKJ (81%) for Polyhedra Network. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 46 Days and Polyhedra Network for 21 Days on average.
| BEAMX | ZKJ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,28T | Rp79,75M |
Volume (24h) | Rp47,59M | Rp38,8M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 800,9M / 1B ZKJ (81%) |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 21 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Polyhedra Network (ZKJ) trades at Rp111.06 with a market cap of Rp88.92M, showing a bearish technical bias from moving averages but bullish oscillators. The token is near key support at Rp110, with RSI_6 at 21.87 indicating potential oversold conditions. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news are available, limiting fundamental catalysts.
Overall outlook is cautious due to weak technical trends and low liquidity. Key opportunities include oversold bounce potential, but risks are high from volatility, thin trading volumes, and regulatory uncertainty in crypto markets. Investors should monitor for network growth or exchange listings to improve sentiment.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Polyhedra Network
Polyhedra Network is revolutionizing the digital landscape by enhancing computational power and enabling seamless interoperability across blockchain, Web2, and Web3. Its flagship technology, zkBridge, facilitates trustless and efficient transactions while also serving as a platform for developing and testing its proof system. By evolving into a general zero-knowledge (ZK) interoperability protocol, Polyhedra connects Web2 and Web3 applications and allows real-world assets to be brought on-chain. With advanced algorithms and innovative protocols, Polyhedra provides developers with a robust foundation to create a wide range of applications, driving a more connected, efficient, and secure digital future.
Read more on ZKJ →
