Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Zentry (ZENT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Zentry — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.31 (market cap Rp1,25T, Rp54,7M 24h volume), while Zentry trades at Rp30.59 (market cap Rp244,87M, Rp26,55M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 5104.7× Zentry's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 8B / 10B ZENT (81%) for Zentry. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 46 Days and Zentry for 30 Days on average.
| BEAMX | ZENT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,25T | Rp244,87M |
Volume (24h) | Rp54,7M | Rp26,55M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 8B / 10B ZENT (81%) |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 30 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Zentry is currently trading at Rp32,171 with a market cap of Rp256.81M, showing bearish technical signals across most indicators. The asset faces strong selling pressure with 17 sell signals versus only 1 buy signal, while oscillators remain neutral. With 81% of the maximum 10M supply in circulation and average hold time of 30 days, the token shows moderate distribution but faces technical headwinds.
Overall outlook remains cautious with key resistance at Rp33 and support at Rp31. Major risks include high volatility and limited liquidity, while opportunities exist if the project demonstrates ecosystem growth. Investors should monitor for protocol updates and exchange developments that could impact price action.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Zentry
Zentry is a real-life MMORPG that brings together the world’s three billion gamers into one unified Play Economy. The platform is powered by a comprehensive ecosystem of consumer apps, a multiversal intellectual property world, game publishers, and blockchain infrastructure. Zentry is pioneering the Metagame Layer, which gamifies activities across Gaming, decentralized finance (DeFi), social interactions, entertainment, and lifestyle. This integration creates Zentry: the world’s largest shared adventure.
Read more on ZENT →
