Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs StakeStone (STO) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs StakeStone — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.04 (market cap Rp1,23T, Rp43,02M 24h volume), while StakeStone trades at Rp678.69 (market cap Rp152,96M, Rp58,47M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 8041.3× StakeStone's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 225,3M / 1B STO (23%) for StakeStone. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and StakeStone for 11 Days on average.
| BEAMX | STO | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,23T | Rp152,96M |
Volume (24h) | Rp43,02M | Rp58,47M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 225,3M / 1B STO (23%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 11 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
StakeStone (STO) is currently trading at Rp681.12 with a market cap of Rp153.39M, showing bearish technical signals overall despite neutral oscillators. The token trades near its pivot point of Rp683, with immediate support at Rp673 and resistance at Rp692. With only 23% of the maximum 1M token supply in circulation and an average hold time of 11 days, the asset shows limited distribution but relatively short-term holding patterns among current investors.
Overall outlook remains cautious with bearish momentum indicators outweighing neutral oscillators. Key opportunity lies in the token's proximity to support levels for potential rebounds, while major risks include low market cap vulnerability, limited liquidity, and the absence of recent ecosystem developments. Investors should monitor trading volume patterns and any protocol updates that could impact token utility.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About StakeStone
StakeStone is a decentralized liquidity infrastructure protocol aimed at optimizing yield generation and liquidity distribution across blockchain networks. Its solutions—such as LiquidityPad and yield-bearing ETH/BTC assets—provide liquidity providers with efficient earning opportunities while addressing the unique liquidity needs of various ecosystems and protocols.
Read more on STO →
