Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Render (RENDER) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Render — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.01 (market cap Rp1,23T, Rp30,31M 24h volume), while Render trades at Rp22,649 (market cap Rp11,7T, Rp332,09M 24h volume). The key difference: Render is far larger — about 9.5× Beam's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 518,8M / 644,2M RENDER (81%) for Render. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Render for 48 Days on average.
| BEAMX | RENDER | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,23T | Rp11,7T |
Volume (24h) | Rp30,31M | Rp332,09M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 518,8M / 644,2M RENDER (81%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 48 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading at Rp23.895 with a market cap of Rp1.23T, showing bearish technical signals with 16 sell indicators versus 4 buy signals. The token is near its S1 support level at Rp24, with RSI readings suggesting potential oversold conditions. With 88% of max supply in circulation and no major protocol updates recently, the asset faces technical headwinds amid neutral market sentiment.
Overall outlook remains cautious with oversold RSI levels offering potential entry points, but bearish moving averages and weak technical structure suggest continued downward pressure. Key risks include low liquidity depth and crypto market volatility, while opportunities exist if the token can hold above key support levels and attract renewed ecosystem development.
Render token currently trades at Rp22,180 with a market cap of Rp11.51T, showing bearish technical signals across moving averages and oscillators. The token is trading near key support levels with RSI indicators suggesting potential oversold conditions. With 81% of max supply in circulation and average hold time of 48 days, the network maintains steady token distribution.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to strong bearish technical signals, though oversold RSI levels may indicate potential short-term bounce opportunities. Major risks include continued selling pressure, crypto market volatility, and limited recent ecosystem developments. Investors should monitor support levels closely.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Render
The Render Network is the first decentralized GPU rendering platform, empowering artists to scale GPU rendering work on-demand to high performance GPU Nodes around the world. Through a blockchain marketplace for idle GPU compute, the network provides artists the ability to scale next generation rendering work at fractions of the cost and at orders of magnitude increases in speed when compared to the centralized GPU cloud.
Read more on RENDER →
