Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Quack AI (Q) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Quack AI — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.04 (market cap Rp1,23T, Rp43,02M 24h volume), while Quack AI trades at Rp385.18 (market cap Rp1,67T, Rp36,9M 24h volume). The key difference: Quack AI is the larger of the two by market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) for Quack AI. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Quack AI for 3 Days on average.
| BEAMX | Q | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,23T | Rp1,67T |
Volume (24h) | Rp43,02M | Rp36,9M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 3 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Quack AI (Q) trades at Rp388.671 with a market cap of Rp1.7T, showing neutral technical signals overall. The token has a circulating supply of 4.3M out of 10M max supply (44% circulation rate) with an average hold time of 3 days. Moving averages indicate bullish momentum while oscillators remain neutral. Recent technical analysis shows the price is near the pivot point of Rp393 with support at Rp377 and resistance at Rp406.
The outlook remains balanced with technical indicators showing mixed signals. Key opportunities include the token's relatively low circulation rate suggesting potential future supply constraints. Major risks include typical crypto volatility and the neutral market sentiment that could lead to sideways trading in the short term.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Quack AI
Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →
