Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Quack AI (Q) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Quack AI — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp27.81 (market cap Rp1,42T, Rp52,01M 24h volume), while Quack AI trades at Rp340.36 (market cap Rp1,42T, Rp79,49M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam and Quack AI are close in size by market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 4,2B / 10B Q (42%) for Quack AI. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 44 Days and Quack AI for 3 Days on average.
| BEAMX | Q | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,42T | Rp1,42T |
Volume (24h) | Rp52,01M | Rp79,49M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 4,2B / 10B Q (42%) |
Typical Hold Time | 44 Days | 3 Days |
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Quack AI
Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →
