Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Neutron (NTRN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Neutron — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.31 (market cap Rp1,24T, Rp32,92M 24h volume), while Neutron trades at Rp25.52 (market cap Rp78,1M, Rp76,5M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 15877.1× Neutron's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 804,1M / 999,7M NTRN (81%) for Neutron. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Neutron for 38 Days on average.
| BEAMX | NTRN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,24T | Rp78,1M |
Volume (24h) | Rp32,92M | Rp76,5M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 804,1M / 999,7M NTRN (81%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 38 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Neutron (NTRN) shows limited market activity with a modest market cap of Rp78,1M and 81% circulating supply. The token exhibits minimal trading volume and network engagement, with no recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem developments. Technical indicators suggest low volatility and limited price movement due to thin liquidity.
Overall outlook remains cautious with major risks including extreme illiquidity, regulatory uncertainty, and lack of developer activity. Key opportunity exists only if the project gains meaningful adoption or exchange listings. Current holders face significant liquidity constraints with average hold time of 38 days.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Neutron
Neutron is the most secure cross-chain smart-contracting platform. It combines the security of a top 10 blockchain by staked capitalization with bleeding-edge cross-chain infrastructure to enable DeFi applications to securely scale across a growing network of 51+ interconnected blockchains.
Read more on NTRN →
