Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Nomina (NOM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Nomina — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.04 (market cap Rp1,23T, Rp29,46M 24h volume), while Nomina trades at Rp26.94 (market cap Rp78,33M, Rp60,67M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 15702.8× Nomina's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 2,9B / 7,5B NOM (39%) for Nomina. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Nomina for 22 Days on average.
| BEAMX | NOM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,23T | Rp78,33M |
Volume (24h) | Rp29,46M | Rp60,67M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 2,9B / 7,5B NOM (39%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 22 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Nomina (NOM) is currently trading at Rp26,937 with a market cap of Rp78.33 million, showing a bearish technical signal overall despite bullish oscillators. The asset has a circulating supply of 2.9 million tokens (39% of max supply) and an average hold time of 22 days. Key technical indicators include an RSI_6 at 27.89 suggesting oversold conditions, with support levels at Rp25 and Rp26. No recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem news are available.
The outlook for NOM is cautious due to conflicting technical signals and low market cap, which increases volatility risk. Opportunities exist if oversold RSI leads to a rebound, but major risks include limited liquidity and absence of recent development activity. Investors should monitor for any new exchange listings or token utility enhancements.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Nomina
Nomina is a rebranded DeFi platform designed to simplify advanced trading strategies and cross-exchange operations in perpetual futures markets. Evolving from Omni Network through a 1:75 token swap, Nomina streamlines complex DeFi trading with automation and unified tools. Built for experienced traders, it enhances efficiency and accessibility across decentralized exchanges, offering a more seamless and intelligent trading experience.
Read more on NOM →
