Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Nibiru Chain (NIBI) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Nibiru Chain — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp23.99 (market cap Rp1,23T, Rp30,34M 24h volume), while Nibiru Chain trades at Rp35.29 (market cap Rp55,17M, Rp4,69M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 22294.7× Nibiru Chain's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 954M / 1,5B NIBI (64%) for Nibiru Chain. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Nibiru Chain for 7 Days on average.
| BEAMX | NIBI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,23T | Rp55,17M |
Volume (24h) | Rp30,34M | Rp4,69M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 954M / 1,5B NIBI (64%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 7 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Nibiru Chain (NIBI) presents a modest market cap of Rp55,17M with 64% of its 1.5M token max supply in circulation. Current price data is unavailable, limiting short-term trend analysis. The 7-day average hold time suggests some holder commitment, but the absence of recent trading data and news indicates low market activity and visibility.
Overall outlook is cautious due to significant data gaps and low liquidity. The primary opportunity lies in the project's early stage if future development gains traction. Major risks include extreme volatility from low trading volume, potential liquidity crunches, and the project's reliance on future ecosystem growth to drive value.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Nibiru Chain
Nibiru Chain is a groundbreaking Layer 1 blockchain and smart contract ecosystem that offers exceptional throughput and unmatched security. Nibiru strives to be the most developer-friendly and user-friendly smart contract ecosystem, leading the way toward mainstream Web3 adoption. It achieves this by innovating at every layer of the technology stack, including dApp development, infrastructure, consensus mechanisms, a comprehensive developer toolkit, and value accrual.
Read more on NIBI →
