Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs MON (MONPRO) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs MON — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp23.85 (market cap Rp1,24T, Rp32,83M 24h volume), while MON trades at Rp24.59 (market cap Rp18,31M, Rp1,36M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 67722.6× MON's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 593,8M / 1B MONPRO (60%) for MON. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and MON for 16 Days on average.
| BEAMX | MONPRO | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,24T | Rp18,31M |
Volume (24h) | Rp32,83M | Rp1,36M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 593,8M / 1B MONPRO (60%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 16 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
MONPRO maintains a modest market cap of Rp18.31M with 60% of its 1M token supply in circulation. The asset shows limited market activity with a relatively short average hold time of 16 days, indicating potential trading rather than long-term holding patterns. No recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem developments have been observed, suggesting minimal network growth momentum.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to low liquidity and limited adoption. Key opportunity lies in potential future protocol development, while major risks include extreme volatility from low market cap and regulatory uncertainty in the crypto space. Investors should monitor for any ecosystem developments that could drive utility.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About MON
MON Protocol is a decentralized digital ecosystem leveraging MONPRO tokens and maintained by validators worldwide. It features a launchpool for user rewards and serves as a web3 platform for blockchain-native games and IPs. With in-house titles like Pixelmon Games and partnerships with top chains, MON Protocol engages a growing gaming community while MONPRO tokens enable governance, in-game utility, and rewards.
Read more on MONPRO →
