Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Marblex (MBX) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Marblex — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp23.56 (market cap Rp1,2T, Rp40,46M 24h volume), while Marblex trades at Rp390.78 (market cap Rp108,73M, Rp11,34M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 11036.5× Marblex's market cap, and Beam's supply is capped (51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%)) while Marblex's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Marblex for 16 Days on average.
| BEAMX | MBX | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,2T | Rp108,73M |
Volume (24h) | Rp40,46M | Rp11,34M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 278,1M MBX |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 16 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Marblex (MBX) is currently trading at Rp394.47 with a market cap of Rp110.11M, showing bearish technical signals overall despite bullish oscillators. The token faces selling pressure with moving averages indicating bearish momentum, while RSI levels remain neutral. Current price sits near the pivot point of Rp397, with immediate support at Rp390 and resistance at Rp402. The 16-day average hold time suggests relatively short-term holding patterns among investors.
Overall outlook remains cautious with technical weakness prevailing. Key opportunity lies in oversold conditions near support levels, while major risks include continued selling pressure and low liquidity. Investors should monitor whether the token can hold above key support zones for potential reversal signals.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Marblex
MBX is a Klaytn Compatible Token (KCT) that operates on the Klaytn blockchain. Klaytn technology is designed for high performance, which enables it to process transactions quickly and efficiently. The KCT is built on the Istanbul BFT consensus algorithm, ensuring both reliability and transparency on the mainnet. Thanks to the advantages provided by KCT, the MBX token can rapidly handle a large volume of transactions related to game content, while also offering users a dependable and transparent operational and management experience.
Read more on MBX →
