Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Kusama (KSM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Kusama — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp23.59 (market cap Rp1,2T, Rp42,44M 24h volume), while Kusama trades at Rp50,953 (market cap Rp943,69M, Rp32,99M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 1271.6× Kusama's market cap, and Beam's supply is capped (51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%)) while Kusama's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Kusama for 78 Days on average.
| BEAMX | KSM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,2T | Rp943,69M |
Volume (24h) | Rp42,44M | Rp32,99M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 18,7M KSM |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 78 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Kusama (KSM) is trading at Rp51,260 with a bearish technical signal, as moving averages indicate strong selling pressure while oscillators are neutral. The current price sits near the pivot point of Rp51,485, with immediate support at Rp50,843. On-chain metrics show an average hold time of 78 days, suggesting reduced selling urgency. Recent ecosystem activity includes ongoing parachain auctions and network upgrades, though no major protocol changes were reported in the last month.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technicals and muted network growth. Key opportunities lie in potential bullish RSI divergence and oversold conditions, but risks include low liquidity and crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor parachain adoption and broader market sentiment for directional cues.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Kusama
Kusama is an experimental version of Polkadot and built by the same team. It was designed to provide unprecedented interoperability and scalability for developers.
Read more on KSM →
