Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs GameSwift (GSWIFT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs GameSwift — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp23.79 (market cap Rp1,22T, Rp36,34M 24h volume), while GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 96748.6× GameSwift's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) for GameSwift. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and GameSwift for 9 Days on average.
| BEAMX | GSWIFT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,22T | Rp12,61M |
Volume (24h) | Rp36,34M | Rp958,63jt |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 9 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
GameSwift (GSWIFT) shows limited market activity with a modest market cap of Rp12.61M and low circulating supply of 360,800 tokens (26% of max supply). The token exhibits minimal trading volume and liquidity, with a short average hold time of 9 days indicating speculative trading patterns. No recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem developments have been observed, suggesting limited network activity.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to extremely low liquidity and market depth. Key opportunity lies in potential future ecosystem growth, while major risks include high volatility from low trading volume, regulatory uncertainty, and limited adoption. Investors should be aware this is a micro-cap token with elevated risk profile.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About GameSwift
GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →
