Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Solana Name Service (FIDA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Solana Name Service — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.57 (market cap Rp1,28T, Rp47,59M 24h volume), while Solana Name Service trades at Rp311.41 (market cap Rp308,46M, Rp108,64M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 4149.6× Solana Name Service's market cap, and Beam's supply is capped (51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%)) while Solana Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 46 Days and Solana Name Service for 34 Days on average.
| BEAMX | FIDA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,28T | Rp308,46M |
Volume (24h) | Rp47,59M | Rp108,64M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 990,9M FIDA |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 34 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
FIDA is currently trading at Rp310.78 with a market cap of Rp307.83 million, showing a bearish technical signal from moving averages but bullish oscillators. The price is near pivot point support at Rp314, with key resistance at Rp319. On-chain metrics indicate an average hold time of 34 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news are reported recently.
Overall outlook is cautious due to bearish technicals; opportunities exist if support holds, but risks include low liquidity and crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor for network developments and trading volume changes.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Solana Name Service
Bonfida is known as a leading infrastructure developer on Solana. They have earned this reputation through their contributions to the ecosystem, providing services and products that support its growth. Some of their contributions include creating the Asset Agnostic Orderbook (AOB) as a new Serum Core engine, simplifying transactions with Solana Name Service, and introducing the first perpetual swap on Solana called Audaces. As a result, their developers are highly respected within the Solana ecosystem.
Read more on FIDA →
