Beam vs COTI — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp24.13 (market cap Rp1,23T, Rp27,7M 24h volume), while COTI trades at Rp198.42 (market cap Rp592,92M, Rp1,27T 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 2074.5× COTI's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 3B / 4,9B COTI (61%) for COTI. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and COTI for 120 Days on average.
| BEAMX | COTI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,23T | Rp592,92M |
Volume (24h) | Rp27,7M | Rp1,27T |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 3B / 4,9B COTI (61%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 120 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →COTI markets itself as the first enterprise-grade fintech platform that empowers organizations to build their own payment solutions as well as digitize any currency to save time as well as money. It is one of the world’s first blockchain protocols that is optimized for decentralized payments and designed for use by merchants, governments, payment DApps, and stablecoin issuers.
Read more on COTI →