Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Cloud (CLOUD) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Cloud — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp28.05 (market cap Rp1,43T, Rp52,79M 24h volume), while Cloud trades at Rp325.05 (market cap --, Rp4,47M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam's supply is capped (51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%)) while Cloud's keeps growing, and Beam is more actively traded (Rp52,79M versus Rp4,47M). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 44 Days and Cloud for 10 Days on average.
| BEAMX | CLOUD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,43T | -- |
Volume (24h) | Rp52,79M | Rp4,47M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | -- |
Typical Hold Time | 44 Days | 10 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is trading at Rp27,908 with a market cap of Rp1.42T, showing bullish technical signals overall. The asset maintains strong moving average support with 8 buy signals versus 5 sell signals, while oscillators remain neutral. Current price action is consolidating near key support levels with RSI_12 indicating potential overbought conditions at 71.90. The token has 88% of its maximum 58.5M supply in circulation with an average hold time of 44 days.
Overall outlook remains cautiously optimistic with technical strength but requires monitoring of overbought conditions. Key opportunities include strong technical momentum and limited token supply, while major risks involve potential profit-taking near resistance levels and the absence of recent protocol updates. Investors should watch for breakouts above Rp30 resistance or breakdowns below Rp25 support.
CLOUD trades at Rp 324.87 with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and strong trend strength indicated by ADX readings. The asset shows neutral oscillators but RSI_6 suggests mild overbought conditions. Support and resistance levels are tightly clustered between Rp 333 and Rp 357, indicating potential for near-term volatility. No major protocol updates or ecosystem developments were identified in recent research.
Overall outlook remains cautiously optimistic due to technical strength, but limited fundamental developments and low circulating supply visibility pose risks. Key opportunities include breakout potential above resistance, while major risks involve low liquidity and typical cryptocurrency volatility patterns that could amplify price swings.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Cloud
Sanctum is the leading liquid staking protocol on Solana, serving retail users, validators, and institutions. It enables enterprises to create custom liquid staking tokens with a unified liquidity layer. Focused on integrity and transparency, Sanctum builds essential infrastructure to shift crypto from speculation to practical utility, offering ethical and secure crypto products to users worldwide.
Read more on CLOUD →
