Compare Beam (BEAMX) vs Catizen (CATI) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Beam vs Catizen — how do they compare? Beam trades at Rp23.79 (market cap Rp1,22T, Rp36,34M 24h volume), while Catizen trades at Rp846.1 (market cap Rp382,48M, Rp136,95M 24h volume). The key difference: Beam is far larger — about 3189.7× Catizen's market cap, and Beam's circulating supply is 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) versus 451,1M / 1B CATI (46%) for Catizen. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Beam for 45 Days and Catizen for 28 Days on average.
| BEAMX | CATI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,22T | Rp382,48M |
Volume (24h) | Rp36,34M | Rp136,95M |
Circulating Supply | 51,3B / 58,5B BEAMX (88%) | 451,1M / 1B CATI (46%) |
Typical Hold Time | 45 Days | 28 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEAMX is currently trading bearishly at Rp24.117, with technical indicators showing strong selling pressure from moving averages and a neutral oscillator stance. The token's circulating supply is 51.3M out of a max 58.5M, with an 88% circulation rate and average hold time of 45 days. No major protocol updates or ecosystem news have been reported recently.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical signals and lack of fundamental catalysts. Key opportunities include oversold RSI levels suggesting potential rebounds, while major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity, and the absence of recent positive developments to drive demand.
Catizen (CATI) is trading at Rp835.7 with a market cap of Rp375.41 million, showing bullish technical signals with strong moving average support. The token has a circulating supply of 451,100 out of 1 million tokens (46% circulation rate) with an average hold time of 28 days. Current price sits above the pivot point of Rp808, indicating positive momentum despite overbought RSI readings.
Overall outlook remains cautiously optimistic with technical strength but faces overbought conditions. Key opportunities include potential breakout above resistance levels, while major risks include profit-taking pressure from elevated RSI levels and limited liquidity depth given the modest market capitalization.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Beam
Beam, formerly known as Merit Circle, is a DAO that focuses on developing the play-to-earn (P2E) economy. Its goal is to create a new era of gameplay where users would be able to earn money by playing games that they love, instead of treating them as a simple hobby. MC token holders have voting rights to decide on the future of the organization, and obtain and stake their tokens to earn rewards.
Read more on BEAMX →About Catizen
Catizen is an innovative gaming bot on Telegram that seamlessly integrates the Telegram x TON blockchain. It aims to transform Web3 access by enabling practical mobile payments. By leveraging Telegram's large user base, Catizen aims to become a central hub for Web3 traffic, attracting hundreds of billions of users. Catizen will function as a mini-app center, combining the unique features of Launchpool with short videos and e-commerce. It will attract and engage users through gamification and strategic Play-to-Airdrop initiatives, revolutionizing the way users access and engage with the Web3 ecosystem.
Read more on CATI →
