Automata Network vs io.net — how do they compare? Automata Network trades at Rp23.1 (market cap Rp85,38M, Rp58,64M 24h volume), while io.net trades at Rp2,037 (market cap Rp778,03M, Rp391,02M 24h volume). The key difference: io.net is far larger — about 9.1× Automata Network's market cap, and io.net's supply is capped (381,5M / 800M IO (48%)) while Automata Network's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Automata Network for 54 Days and io.net for 34 Days on average.
| ATA | IO | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp85,38M | Rp778,03M |
Volume (24h) | Rp58,64M | Rp391,02M |
Circulating Supply | 971,3M ATA | 381,5M / 800M IO (48%) |
Typical Hold Time | 54 Days | 34 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Automata Network (ATA) is redefining privacy and security in the blockchain space with its modular system that boosts machine trust on Ethereum through TEE Coprocessors. This innovative approach integrates features like Conveyor, Intel SGX, and App-Specific Rollup, providing robust solutions for decentralized apps (dApps). By using TEE technology, Automata Network ensures data remains secure and private.
Read more on ATA →io.net, formerly known as ANTBIT, leverages a decentralized computing network powered by Solana and Aptos to provide machine learning engineers with access to distributed cloud clusters. It aims to address challenges like limited availability, poor choice, and high costs associated with accessing GPUs in the public cloud.
Read more on IO →