Aster vs Newton Protocol — how do they compare? Aster trades at Rp10,751 (market cap Rp29,06T, Rp568,78M 24h volume), while Newton Protocol trades at Rp673.18 (market cap Rp210,49M, Rp37,31M 24h volume). The key difference: Aster is far larger — about 138058.8× Newton Protocol's market cap, and Aster's circulating supply is 2,7B / 8B ASTER (34%) versus 312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%) for Newton Protocol. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Aster for 23 Days and Newton Protocol for 26 Days on average.
| ASTER | NEWT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp29,06T | Rp210,49M |
Volume (24h) | Rp568,78M | Rp37,31M |
Circulating Supply | 2,7B / 8B ASTER (34%) | 312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%) |
Typical Hold Time | 23 Days | 26 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Aster is a next-generation decentralized exchange combining Perpetual and Spot trading in one on-chain platform. It supports advanced features like stock perpetuals and grid trading across multiple chains, while enabling asBNB and USDF as collateral for superior capital efficiency. Built on Aster Chain and backed by YZi Labs, Aster powers fast, flexible, and community-first DeFi with the ASTER token driving governance and rewards.
Read more on ASTER →The Newton Protocol serves as a verifiable automation layer for on-chain finance, enabling users to delegate complex, cross-chain actions to AI agents while ensuring that each step adheres to user-DeFined guidelines through cryptographic guarantees. It combines smart accounts, such as ERC-4337 and EIP-7702, to allow for detailed delegation, along with trusted execution environment (TEE) attestations and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify the correctness of every off-chain decision. The ultimate aim is to transform automation into a trust-minimized framework, thereby facilitating agentic finance across multiple blockchains.
Read more on NEWT →